Pittsburgh Riverhounds (DLLWL) project at 1.3 expected goals versus 1.1 for FC Tulsa (LWLWD). The blended Poisson, form, rating and market signals lean Under 2.5 Goals at 71/100 confidence with medium risk.
Confidence
71/100
FC Tulsa 0-0 Pittsburgh Riverhounds
2025-11-22T18:00:00+01:00
No BTTS
Under 2.5
FC Tulsa 2-2 Pittsburgh Riverhounds
2024-05-12T02:30:00+02:00
BTTS
Over 2.5
Pittsburgh Riverhounds 0-1 FC Tulsa
2024-05-08T01:00:00+02:00
No BTTS
Under 2.5
Pittsburgh Riverhounds 3-2 FC Tulsa
2023-10-01T01:00:00+02:00
BTTS
Over 2.5
FC Tulsa 0-0 Pittsburgh Riverhounds
2023-03-29T02:00:00+02:00
No BTTS
Under 2.5
Pittsburgh Riverhounds 1-0 Tulsa Roughnecks
2022-07-31T01:00:00+02:00
This forecast was recorded on Wed, 29 Jul 2026 20:02 UTC and is frozen: it will be graded against the final score on the public track record after full time.
Predictions are probabilistic and for informational/analytical purposes only. No outcome is guaranteed.
AI prediction
Under 2.5 Goals
Confidence 71/100
Strongest cover
12
71.7% probability
Risk classification
Medium
28.3% draw weight
Value status
Unpriced
Pre-match odds unavailable
Market sample
Unavailable
No pre-match quotes
Full distribution
1X2
Goals
Both teams to score
Complementary outcomes total 100%; values are model estimates, not implied guarantees.
Inputs behind the forecast
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
4/15 recent form points
FC Tulsa
7/15 recent form points
The live data feed does not provide xG in this statistics response. This forecast uses the 2026 historical season baseline, falls back to observed scoring and conceding rates, and lowers its data-quality assessment.
Recent meetings: BTTS in 3/7 and Over 2.5 in 3/7.
Price interpretation
Odds unavailable for this fixture
The forecast is based on team and matchup evidence only. No model-versus-market edge is claimed until a complete price set is available.
Provenance
No BTTS
Under 2.5
Tulsa Roughnecks 3-4 Pittsburgh Riverhounds
2022-04-09T20:00:00+02:00
BTTS
Over 2.5
No pre-match bookmaker prices are available for this fixture. The model does not claim a market edge.
Confidence reflects separation, form, market agreement and volatility. It does not equal the probability of the displayed pick, and it should not be used as a stake recommendation.